Within Spielberg

Are Spielberg's Aliens Friendly or Frightening?

Spielberg's alien films are best read as a spectrum between hope, fear, care and helplessness.

On this page

  • Close Encounters as invitation
  • E.T. as vulnerability
  • War of the Worlds as catastrophe
Preview for Are Spielberg's Aliens Friendly or Frightening?

Introduction

Spielberg’s alien films are not simply divided between “good aliens” and “bad aliens”. They work better as a spectrum: invitation in Close Encounters of the Third Kind, vulnerability in E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, and catastrophe in War of the Worlds. The aliens may be friendly, helpless, unknowable or murderous, but Spielberg repeatedly uses them to test human behaviour under pressure. Do people listen, care, panic, hide the truth, protect children, or surrender to awe?

Overview image for Hope vs Fear That is why the contrast matters. In Spielberg’s UFO cinema, extraterrestrial contact is never only about the visitors. It is about the human response to overwhelming difference. The friendly alien does not remove fear; the invasion alien does not remove wonder. Spielberg’s most memorable alien stories sit in the unstable space between hope and helplessness, where contact exposes both human tenderness and human fragility. AFI’s tribute to Spielberg captures one side of that legacy by describing Close Encounters and E.T. as films that reimagined aliens as “wondrous figures of hope”, but War of the Worlds shows how far that hope can darken when the encounter becomes attack rather than communication. [American Film Institute]afi.comAmerican Film InstituteSteven SpielbergFrom that point on, he went from strength to strength: reimagining space aliens as wondrous figure…

Spielberg’s aliens are a spectrum, not a verdict

The common shorthand is that Spielberg “believes in friendly aliens”. That is partly true, but too simple. Close Encounters of the Third Kind is full of fear: abductions, government deception, family breakdown, dangerous obsession and a final approach to the unknown that is beautiful precisely because it could have been terrible. E.T. is warmer, but it is also a film about illness, pursuit, quarantine and separation. War of the Worlds then strips away the consoling possibility of mutual understanding and imagines contact as a disaster humans cannot negotiate with. AFI Catalog [Amblin Official Site]amblin.comOfficial Site E.TThe Extra-Terrestrial (1982) - About the Movie | AmblinAs Elliott attempts to help his extra-terrestrial friend contact his home planet s…

The mechanism is consistent even when the tone changes. Spielberg does not make aliens interesting by explaining their society in detail. He makes them powerful by controlling how much humans can understand. In the hopeful films, partial understanding becomes a bridge: lights, music, touch, gesture, imitation, shared feeling. In the frightening film, the lack of explanation becomes terror: the invaders do not speak, bargain or justify themselves. The same gap between species can produce awe or panic depending on whether the encounter allows reciprocity. [Roger Ebert]rogerebert.comRoger Ebert Creaking Havoc movie review & filmRoger EbertCreaking Havoc movie review & film summaryWhat happened to the sense of wonder Spielberg celebrated in “Close Encounters of th… [Roger]rogerebert.comRoger Ebert Creaking Havoc movie review & filmRoger EbertCreaking Havoc movie review & film summaryWhat happened to the sense of wonder Spielberg celebrated in “Close Encounters of th…

That is why “friendly versus invasion aliens” in Spielberg is less a species chart than a moral pressure system. The question is not just whether extraterrestrials are benevolent or hostile. The deeper question is whether contact leaves room for care. When communication is possible, Spielberg tends towards wonder. When communication collapses, he turns towards dread.

Hope vs Fear illustration 1

Close Encounters as invitation

Close Encounters of the Third Kind is Spielberg’s great alien-invitation film, but it is not naïve. The UFOs terrify drivers, disrupt homes, imprint compulsive visions and draw ordinary people towards Devils Tower without giving them a clear explanation. Roy Neary’s sighting does not make him enlightened in a neat heroic way; it damages his family life and makes him look irrational to the people around him. AFI’s catalogue notes the film’s direct connection to J. Allen Hynek’s UFO classification system, with Hynek’s work providing the title and lending the film a recognisable UFO-investigation framework. [AFI Catalog]catalog.afi.com67160 CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KINDJ. Allen Hynek, who created the hierarchy of alien encounters. An item in…

The invitation lies in the film’s final grammar of contact. The aliens are not defeated, dissected or exposed as monsters. They are approached through light, sound and pattern. AFI’s screening note highlights François Truffaut’s role as the specialist leading the attempt to communicate with the aliens, and John Williams’s five-tone motif became central to the film’s idea that first contact might begin as a shared language rather than a military confrontation. [afi]silver.afi.comSource details in endnotes. Silver Theatre and Cultural Center

The risk in Close Encounters is not that the aliens are secretly evil; it is that the invitation overwhelms human life. Roy’s awe has a cost. Spielberg later acknowledged that, if he were making the film after becoming a parent, he would not have had Roy leave his family to board the mothership. That hindsight complicates the film’s optimism: the alien encounter is transcendent, but the human responsibilities left behind do not simply vanish. [Wikipedia]WikipediaClose Encounters of the Third KindClose Encounters of the Third Kind

This makes Close Encounters a useful middle point in Spielberg’s alien spectrum. The visitors are friendly, or at least non-hostile, but their presence is not gentle. Wonder arrives as disruption. The film’s emotional power comes from treating contact as something humans long for and may not be ready to absorb.

E.T. as vulnerability

E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial turns the alien from a cosmic force into a frightened body. E.T. is not a fleet, a godlike intelligence or an invader. He is stranded, lost, curious, ill and dependent on children. Amblin’s official synopsis frames the story around Elliott helping his extraterrestrial friend contact home while eluding scientists and government agents who want to apprehend him. That makes the alien “friendly” in a very specific way: he is not powerful because he can conquer Earth, but because he awakens care. [Amblin Official Site]amblin.comOfficial Site E.TThe Extra-Terrestrial (1982) - About the Movie | AmblinAs Elliott attempts to help his extra-terrestrial friend contact his home planet s…

The film’s emotional structure reverses the usual alien-threat model. The danger does not come primarily from the visitor; it comes from adult systems that treat the visitor as an object of control. Roger Ebert’s review stresses how the early pursuit is staged from the small creature’s point of view, with searchlights, fog and jangling keys making humans feel frightening. The alien is strange, but the frightening figures are the ones hunting him. [Roger Ebert]rogerebert.comRoger Ebert Creaking Havoc movie review & filmRoger EbertCreaking Havoc movie review & film summaryWhat happened to the sense of wonder Spielberg celebrated in “Close Encounters of th…

E.T.’s friendliness is also inseparable from pain. His bond with Elliott is not just companionship; it becomes shared feeling and shared physical decline. The film’s famous warmth depends on the possibility that the alien might die in a suburban house because humans cannot protect what they love from institutions, biology and separation. AFI’s detailed plot summary emphasises the quarantine sequence, medical testing, E.T.’s apparent death and the children’s rescue effort, all of which push the friendly-alien story into a register of helplessness rather than simple comfort. [American Film Institute]afi.comAmerican Film InstituteSteven SpielbergFrom that point on, he went from strength to strength: reimagining space aliens as wondrous figure…

This is why E.T. remains Spielberg’s clearest argument for empathy across difference. The alien is not friendly because he resembles us completely. He is friendly because the children learn to recognise feeling where adults first see a specimen. The film’s practical ethic is simple but demanding: the test of contact is whether the vulnerable stranger is protected or captured. The Guardian’s 40th-anniversary reflection similarly reads the film as a work centred on childhood empathy, not merely a cute science-fiction premise. [The Guardian]theguardian.comThe Guardian ET the Extra-Terrestrial at 40: Spielberg's sci-fi smashThe Guardian ET the Extra-Terrestrial at 40: Spielberg's sci-fi smash

Hope vs Fear illustration 2

War of the Worlds as catastrophe

War of the Worlds is the stark opposite of the invitation model. Spielberg’s 2005 aliens do not arrive to teach, heal, phone home or exchange musical phrases. They attack from machines already buried beneath human streets, turning the familiar world into a trap. In an interview published around the film’s release, Spielberg said he and screenwriter David Koepp deliberately avoided explaining the attackers in detail; the characters are fleeing without knowing why they are being attacked or who exactly is attacking them. [Emanuellevy]emanuellevy.comWar of the Worlds According to SpielbergWar of the Worlds According to Spielberg - Emanuel Levy26 Jun 2005 — In the movie, you see American fleeing for their lives, b…

That refusal of explanation is the film’s core horror mechanism. In Close Encounters, not knowing invites pursuit; in War of the Worlds, not knowing produces paralysis. The aliens are frightening not because they are psychologically rich villains, but because they are unreachable. No shared code emerges. No childlike bond softens them. No benevolent scientist can translate their intentions. The human characters are left with survival, flight and fragments of rumour. [Roger Ebert]rogerebert.comRoger Ebert Creaking Havoc movie review & filmRoger EbertCreaking Havoc movie review & film summaryWhat happened to the sense of wonder Spielberg celebrated in “Close Encounters of th…

The film’s post-9/11 atmosphere makes that helplessness sharper. Contemporary and later criticism has often linked its imagery to terrorist attack and mass panic: dust-covered bodies, missing-person notices, crowds fleeing without clear information, and ordinary infrastructure failing suddenly. The Independent described the film on its 20th anniversary as using 9/11 imagery and a specifically American sense of panic, while RogerEbert.com’s later essay on invasion films notes that in Spielberg’s War of the Worlds, human institutions, weapons and leaders are no match for the extraterrestrial assault. [The Independent]independent.co.ukwar of the worlds spielberg tom cruise b2782006war of the worlds spielberg tom cruise b2782006

Yet War of the Worlds is not simply Spielberg “turning against aliens”. It is Spielberg testing what happens when the conditions that made his earlier alien films hopeful are removed. No meaningful communication. No mutual recognition. No time to gaze upward in wonder. The result is not a philosophical debate about whether alien life exists, but a nightmare of asymmetry: one side has unknowable power, the other has children to protect.

The human test: communication, care and control

Across these three films, Spielberg’s aliens change, but the human test remains recognisable. The central question is not “Are aliens good?” but “What kind of human world does contact reveal?” In Close Encounters, the answer is a world of secrecy and obsession, but also curiosity and the possibility of shared language. In E.T., it is a world where children can respond with care before adults can classify. In War of the Worlds, it is a world where social order collapses when the other side offers no channel for appeal. AFI Catalog [Amblin Official Site]amblin.comOfficial Site E.TThe Extra-Terrestrial (1982) - About the Movie | AmblinAs Elliott attempts to help his extra-terrestrial friend contact his home planet s…

The friendly films depend on bridges. Close Encounters uses music and spectacle. E.T. uses touch, mimicry, domestic objects and emotional synchrony. These are not just sentimental devices; they are mechanisms for making the alien legible without making him ordinary. The visitor remains strange, but strangeness becomes survivable because some form of exchange is possible. [afi]silver.afi.comSource details in endnotes. Silver Theatre and Cultural Center

The invasion film depends on broken bridges. Spielberg’s War of the Worlds withholds alien motivation so completely that the invaders become a force rather than a society. This is a major shift from the awe of Close Encounters: the unknown is no longer an invitation to expand human consciousness, but a threat that reveals how little control humans possess. Ebert’s review explicitly asks what happened to the sense of wonder Spielberg had celebrated earlier, which is precisely the point of the contrast. [Roger Ebert]rogerebert.comRoger Ebert Creaking Havoc movie review & filmRoger EbertCreaking Havoc movie review & film summaryWhat happened to the sense of wonder Spielberg celebrated in “Close Encounters of th…

Seen together, the films suggest that Spielberg’s hope is conditional rather than automatic. Contact becomes hopeful when it allows recognition. It becomes frightening when it abolishes recognition. The alien is not the only variable; the structure of the encounter matters.

Hope vs Fear illustration 3

Why the friendly aliens still carry risk

Spielberg’s friendly aliens are not risk-free. Close Encounters is often remembered for its luminous ending, but Roy’s journey is also a story of compulsion. He is chosen, or summoned, in a way that he cannot rationally explain and cannot easily resist. The film validates his experience, but it does not erase the damage caused by his fixation. This is one reason the film remains more unsettling than a simple utopian first-contact tale. [Roger Ebert]rogerebert.comRoger Ebert Creaking Havoc movie review & filmRoger EbertCreaking Havoc movie review & film summaryWhat happened to the sense of wonder Spielberg celebrated in “Close Encounters of th…

E.T. is gentler, but its risk is intimacy. Elliott’s bond with E.T. is beautiful because it is porous: each feels the other’s condition. That same porousness means E.T.’s suffering becomes Elliott’s suffering. Friendship across species is not presented as a safe fantasy in which the alien merely grants wishes. It is a relationship that exposes a child to loss, fear, secrecy and moral responsibility. [American Film Institute]afi.comAmerican Film InstituteSteven SpielbergFrom that point on, he went from strength to strength: reimagining space aliens as wondrous figure…

This matters because Spielberg’s hopeful alien films are sometimes treated as pure comfort cinema. They are more demanding than that. They ask whether humans can bear wonder without possession, and whether love can protect the vulnerable without trying to own them. Even the friendliest contact carries danger when institutions, families or individuals cannot respond wisely.

Why the invasion aliens are not just monsters

The aliens in War of the Worlds are horrifying, but Spielberg’s focus is still human-scale. The film is less interested in generals, laboratories or planetary strategy than in Ray Ferrier trying to keep his children alive. RogerEbert.com notes that both Signs and Spielberg’s War of the Worlds shift invasion away from conventional war and towards ordinary people simply trying to survive. This makes the alien attack a test of parental responsibility rather than a celebration of military victory. [Roger Ebert]rogerebert.comRoger Ebert Creaking Havoc movie review & filmRoger EbertCreaking Havoc movie review & film summaryWhat happened to the sense of wonder Spielberg celebrated in “Close Encounters of th…

That choice keeps the invasion from becoming a simple monster spectacle. The invaders are nearly abstract, but the human consequences are intimate: panic in crowds, moral compromise, failed protection, and the terror of not being able to explain the world to a child. The New Yorker’s 2005 review similarly emphasised the film’s focus on raw survival rather than high-level scientific or political response.

Even the ending reinforces human limitation. The aliens are defeated not by heroic mastery, but by microbes, echoing H. G. Wells’s original logic that Earth’s smallest organisms accomplish what human power cannot. In Spielberg’s version, that resolution fits the broader pattern: humanity survives, but not because it understood, negotiated with or outperformed the invaders. Survival is partly grace, partly biology, and partly endurance. [Wikipedia]WikipediaWar of the Worlds (2005 filmWar of the Worlds (2005 film

The takeaway: hope and fear need each other in Spielberg’s UFO cinema

Spielberg’s alien films endure because they refuse a single answer to the UFO imagination. Close Encounters says the unknown might call us into a larger conversation. E.T. says the unknown might arrive as someone fragile who needs shelter. War of the Worlds says the unknown might also be indifferent, violent and impossible to reason with. None of these films cancels the others. Together they form Spielberg’s most important extraterrestrial argument: contact is morally unstable because it magnifies whatever conditions surround it.

The hopeful films are memorable because fear is present. The frightening film is memorable because Spielberg once taught audiences to expect wonder from the sky. That earlier hope makes the later catastrophe feel like a betrayal of a dream, not just a genre switch. Friendly aliens and invasion aliens in Spielberg are therefore best understood as two ends of one imaginative system: communication versus silence, care versus control, invitation versus helplessness.

The result is not a neat message about whether aliens would be saviours or destroyers. It is a cinematic test of readiness. Spielberg’s friendliest aliens ask whether humans can respond to difference with trust and protection. His invasion aliens ask what remains when trust is impossible. In both cases, the UFO is not just an object in the sky; it is a mirror held up to human fear, longing and responsibility.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Are Spielberg's Aliens Friendly or Frightening?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

BookCover for UFO

UFO

By Garrett M. Graff

Gives real-world context for why alien contact can be imagined as both hopeful and threatening.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA

Endnotes

  1. Source: afi.com
    Link: https://www.afi.com/laa/steven-spielberg/
    Source snippet

    American Film InstituteSteven SpielbergFrom that point on, he went from strength to strength: reimagining space aliens as wondrous figure...

  2. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: Roger Ebert Creaking Havoc movie review & film
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/war-of-the-worlds-2005
    Source snippet

    Roger EbertCreaking Havoc movie review & film summaryWhat happened to the sense of wonder Spielberg celebrated in “Close Encounters of th...

  3. Source: catalog.afi.com
    Title: 67160 CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND
    Link: https://catalog.afi.com/Film/67160-CLOSE-ENCOUNTERS-OF-THE-THIRD-KIND
    Source snippet

    J. Allen Hynek, who created the hierarchy of alien encounters. An item in...

  4. Source: amblin.com
    Title: Official Site E.T
    Link: https://amblin.com/movie/[e-t
    Source snippet

    The Extra-Terrestrial (1982) - About the Movie | AmblinAs Elliott attempts to help his extra-terrestrial friend contact his home planet s...

  5. Source: rogerebert.com
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/close-encounters-of-the-third-kind-1980
    Source snippet

    Roger EbertClose Encounters of the Third Kind movie reviewThe original film was an astonishing achievement, capturing the feeling of awe...

  6. Source: rogerebert.com
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-et-the-extra-terrestrial-1982
    Source snippet

    Roger EbertE.T. The Extra-Terrestrial movie reviewThe early scenes show a spaceship landing, and they suggest that a little creature has...

  7. Source: emanuellevy.com
    Title: War of the Worlds According to Spielberg
    Link: https://emanuellevy.com/interviews/war-of-the-worlds-according-to-spielberg-4/
    Source snippet

    War of the Worlds According to Spielberg - Emanuel Levy26 Jun 2005 — In the movie, you see American fleeing for their lives, b...

  8. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: top secret steven spielberg on the brink of the close encounters premiere
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/interviews/top-secret-steven-spielberg-on-the-brink-of-the-close-encounters-premiere

  9. Source: silver.afi.com
    Link: https://silver.afi.com/now-playing/

  10. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Close Encounters of the Third Kind
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close_Encounters_of_the_Third_Kind

  11. Source: afi.com
    Link: https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-cheers/

  12. Source: rogerebert.com
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/et-the-extra-terrestrial-2002

  13. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: Roger Ebert Take the Strangeness Away: On Signs and War of the Worlds
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/features/take-the-strangeness-away-on-signs-and-war-of-the-worlds

  14. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: thumbnails special edition war of the worlds
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/features/thumbnails-special-edition-war-of-the-worlds

  15. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: close encounters of the third kind 2017
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/close-encounters-of-the-third-kind-2017

  16. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: War of the Worlds (2005 film)
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Worlds_%282005_film%29

  17. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: E.T. the Extra Terrestrial
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.T._the_Extra-Terrestrial

  18. Source: afi.com
    Title: e t the extra terrestrial afi movie club
    Link: https://www.afi.com/news/e-t-the-extra-terrestrial-afi-movie-club/

  19. Source: afi.com
    Link: https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-heroes-villians/

  20. Source: afi.com
    Link: https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-movies-10th-anniversary-edition/

  21. Source: afi.com
    Link: https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-movie-quotes/

  22. Source: afi.com
    Link: https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-laughs/

  23. Source: afi.com
    Link: https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-thrills/

  24. Source: afi.com
    Link: https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-movies/

  25. Source: afi.com
    Link: https://www.afi.com/afis-10-top-10/

  26. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: preview close encounters of the third kind
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/preview-close-encounters-of-the-third-kind

  27. Source: rogerebert.com
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/features/roger-eberts-best-and-worst-alien-movie-list

  28. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: epix presents slow dirge to the end of the war of the worlds
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/streaming/epix-presents-slow-dirge-to-the-end-of-the-war-of-the-worlds

  29. Source: rogerebert.com
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/[disclosure-day

  30. Source: rogerebert.com
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/scanners/ce3k-30-30

  31. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: making contact spielbergs close encounters and et
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/scanners/making-contact-spielbergs-close-encounters-and-et

  32. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: super 8 spielberg lite
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/scanners/super-8-spielberg-lite

  33. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: Earth to Echo movie review & film
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/earth-to-echo-2014

  34. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: man of steel feet of clay
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/far-flung-correspondents/man-of-steel-feet-of-clay

  35. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: Jurassic Park movie review & film
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/jurassic-park-1993

  36. Source: rogerebert.com
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/batteries-not-included-1987

  37. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: movies that are made for forever
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/movies-that-are-made-for-forever

  38. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: chicken little 2005
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/chicken-little-2005

  39. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: Stir Of Echoes movie review & film
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/stir-of-echoes-1999

  40. Source: rogerebert.com
    Title: alien autopsy martians as metaphors
    Link: https://www.rogerebert.com/scanners/alien-autopsy-martians-as-metaphors

  41. Source: theguardian.com
    Title: The Guardian ET the Extra-Terrestrial at 40: Spielberg’s sci-fi smash
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jun/11/et-steven-spielberg-extra-terrestrial-40-years-old

  42. Source: independent.co.uk
    Title: war of the worlds spielberg tom cruise b2782006
    Link: https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/war-of-the-worlds-spielberg-tom-cruise-b2782006.html

  43. Source: jhwikicollection-20.fandom.com
    Title: Close Encounters of the Third Kind
    Link: https://jhwikicollection-20.fandom.com/wiki/Close_Encounters_of_the_Third_Kind

  44. Source: twinpeaks.fandom.com
    Title: Close Encounters of the Third Kind
    Link: https://twinpeaks.fandom.com/wiki/Close_Encounters_of_the_Third_Kind

  45. Source: reverseshot.org
    Title: war of the worlds
    Link: https://reverseshot.org/archive/entry/725/war-of-the-worlds

  46. Source: theguardian.com
    Title: If aliens do exist, should we be told? Steven Spielberg’s
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/steven-spielbergs-disclosure-day/2026/may/22/should-we-be-told-if-aliens-exist-disclosure-day-explores-the-question

Additional References

  1. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Steven Spielberg says he’s believed in alien life since ‘Close Encounters’
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSX69Fx2Xug
    Source snippet

    Steven Spielberg talks "Disclosure Day" and says aliens "have been here and they are here"...

  2. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fW73jP8RolM
    Source snippet

    Something Is Watching Us | Spielberg's Disclosure Day Trailer...

  3. Source: loc.gov
    Link: https://www.loc.gov/static/programs/national-film-preservation-board/documents/ET.pdf

  4. Source: cinephiliabeyond.org
    Link: https://cinephiliabeyond.org/close-encounters-of-the-third-kind-steven-spielbergs-gamble-that-paid-off-generously/

  5. Source: researchgate.net
    Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318354252_Alien_Invasions_and_Identity_Crisis_Steven_Spielberg%27s_The_War_of_the_Worlds_2005

  6. Source: ebsco.com
    Link: https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/film/close-encounters-third-kind-film

  7. Source: filmfestival.nl
    Link: https://www.filmfestival.nl/en/film/close-encounters-of-the-third-kind

  8. Source: frankrose.com
    Link: https://www.frankrose.com/reporting/spielbergs-war-of-the-worlds/

  9. Source: instagram.com
    Link: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZCuHiWFNuH/

  10. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/577478936403574/posts/2024189121732541/

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Parent topic

Spielberg

Related pages 29

More on this topic 6